Don't get me wrong I love the Redeemer no doubt, But the Connie is a 3x award winning ship but gets out done and out shined by a new comer.

CIG , the lore ant adding up. I like the fact that the Redeemer is a focus driven ship but one of our Connies should be able to match it pound for pound.

The Andromeda is a freighter at best but in the Connie line up there's already a freighter. So how dose the Andromeda stands alone and out?

RSI manufactures have been building ships for a very long time It dose not make any since to me why they would make a mistake by building two of the same ship only difference is 2feet of cargo or something like that and allowing their flagship product fall underdog to a new comer.

The Andromeda was never a military ship to later be decommission for civilian use WHY?

CIG it's not adding up.

The Andromeda dose not have to be a drop ship but make it a battle ship. RSI took out the missile pods that popped out the roof of the ship
com'on RSI you're crippling her and the cargo area isn't really needed we as citizens will have plenty of cargo space to satisfy our merchant pleasures for a long time to come.

So I'm asking PLEASE don't let the Andromeda launch into the PU looking basic the Taurus is already basic. Andromeda dose not have to out do the Redeemer just be able match it teeth for teeth

CIG you just maid the Andromeda look like the runt of the litter in its class. That's not right.

$275 package price for the Redeemer is totally justified But with the Redeemer upgrades just maid the Andromeda value go WAYYYYYY dowwwwn.

P.S. I give a shout out to the creators and developers of the Aegis Redeemer awesome job.